VA’S REVIEW OF OVER 1 MILLION DISABILITY CLAIMS SPARKS CONCERN. WHAT VETERANS NEED TO KNOW
COMMENT
SHARE

When Veterans heard the Department of Veterans Affairs was building a tool to scan Disability Benefits Questionnaires, or DBQs for fraud, the first question on everyone’s mind was,
Is the VA about to reopen my old disability claim?
That concern came from early reporting that a Veterans Benefits Administration official said the system could analyze more than a million public-facing DBQs dating back to 2010, raising the possibility of a sweeping look back at previously decided claims.
But that’s not how the VA is describing the effort now.
Pete Kasperowicz said the tool is “forward-looking only” and will not be used to revisit previously finalized and processed DBQs.
That changes the story and what Veterans need to take away from it.
What the VA Says the Tool Will Do
The VA says it is developing an automated fraud-screening or data-collection tool tied to DBQs, the medical questionnaires used as evidence in disability claims.
VA officials said the system is “not an AI tool” and is intended to help staff identify patterns that may point to suspected fraud, including organized or high-volume submissions tied to third-party actors.
Military Benefits Eligibility Checker
Answer a few questions to discover which military and VA benefits you or your family may be eligible for.
10 questions · ~2 min
If you’re considering working with an unaccredited claims representative promising to simplify with the help of AI, to get you a higher rating 10x faster, remember what you read here.
The VA also described the effort as a safeguard aimed at detecting questionable DBQs and protecting the integrity of the claims process.
It’s important to understand that the tool is designed to assist staff, not replace human decision-making. So, for now at least, robots won’t be determining the future of disability claims.
Why Advocates Reacted So Strongly
The initial concern wasn’t just about fraud detection, it was about scope and trust. Disabled American Veterans said it had concerns about VA’s planned use of an AI tool to identify potential fraud in DBQs going back more than 15 years and asked for clarity on safeguards and due process.
That reaction reflected the broader version of the plan advocates believed they were responding to at the time, before VA clarified that finalized DBQs would not be revisited.
The concern also exists within a real policy backdrop. VA and investigators have warned about DBQ-related fraud schemes involving unaccredited third-party companies charging Veterans for assistance with claims, which is against the law.

What Can Get a DBQ Flagged
Some examples of the patterns VA says may trigger closer review include:
- Similar or repeated “boilerplate” language across forms
- Questionnaires completed by providers located far from the Veteran
The VA references “telltale signs” such as missing required information or inconsistencies in examiner details. While these are not proof of fraud, they are indicators that VA says may prompt further review. It is important to note that a flagged record is not a finding.
What prompted this review? Bottom line up front, it wasn’t the belief that Veterans are trying to take advantage of the system. They’re not, and that has nothing to do with what this process is about.
For many Veterans who are overwhelmed by the DBQ itself, or the claims process - they often turn to claims representatives, both accredited and unaccredited. Many of these companies copy-and-paste patient information en masse. The automation tool the VA is using to scan some of these records, is to identify the commonalities that actually demonstrate irregularities, not records that have been embellished, or exaggerated. The premise is to identify DBQs that were likely not filled out by the Veteran, or an accredited representative.
For example, let’s say 1,000 Veterans have tinnitus as a part of their service-connected conditions detailed on their DBQ. It is highly unlikely that 1,000 physicians would use the same exact words, terminology, and symptom descriptions for all 1,000 patients. Unaccredited claims representatives, who are legally not authorized to charge for their services, don’t have that visibility - their sole focus is the promise of getting higher disability ratings for Veterans. If they copy and paste a little here, and a little there - well, they’re just trying to get the veteran a higher rating.
There’s one big problem with that, and in the eyes of the VA, that is called fraud. The kind of fraud this tool is designed to identify.

What the VA Says Will Not Happen
The VA has drawn a clear line around what this effort does not do.
- It will not reopen finalized DBQs
- It will not automatically reduce or deny benefits
If a DBQ is flagged, VA officials say it may lead to additional review, such as a new Compensation and Pension exam, but is not an automatic loss of benefits.
A New Message Veterans May See During Claims Processing
On March 17, the VA posted on X, that Veterans may begin receiving emails or text messages if additional information is needed for a claim.
According to VA, those messages may include a link to the Claim Assist Portal, which the agency described as:
“A secure way to answer brief questions and help avoid delays.”
VA emphasized in the post that these communications are official and safe, noting:
“VA may email and SMS you… It’s safe, official, from the VA.”
The message denotes a much bigger interest by VA to streamline claims processing and reduce delays, but it is not specifically tied, for now, to the fraud-screening tool they’re currently developing.

What Veterans Should Do Now
For most Veterans, the best thing you can do is pay attention to the latest developments on this project already underway at the Department of Veterans Affairs. You do not need to assume your past claim is being reopened.
But, if you are filing a claim now:
- Make sure documentation is accurate and complete
- Be extremely cautious of unaccredited third-party companies illegally charging for claim help
- Use VA-accredited representatives whenever possible
These steps align with the overarching concerns raised by Veteran advocacy groups, not a new VA directive. This is VA’s response to increased scrutiny in the system. What they will uncover remains to be seen.
For now the focus stays where it should: on the accuracy of new claims, the integrity of the process, and making sure legitimate benefits are protected, not put at risk by confusion around how this system works.
Suggested reads:
Join the Conversation
BY NATALIE OLIVERIO
Veteran & Senior Contributor, Military News at VeteranLife
Navy Veteran
Natalie Oliverio is a Navy Veteran, journalist, and entrepreneur whose reporting brings clarity, compassion, and credibility to stories that matter most to military families. With more than 100 published articles, she has become a trusted voice on defense policy, family life, and issues shaping the...
Credentials
Expertise
Natalie Oliverio is a Navy Veteran, journalist, and entrepreneur whose reporting brings clarity, compassion, and credibility to stories that matter most to military families. With more than 100 published articles, she has become a trusted voice on defense policy, family life, and issues shaping the...



